Military Insanity & Homeland Insecurity
|
By the late 1960s, Bernard Bereanu, a brilliant Romanian statistician specializing in stochastic programming problems and later the author of "Self-Activation of the World Nuclear Weapons System" demonstrated that nuclear deterrence would eventually but unavoidably result in the accidental inception of a nuclear war with the likely end-state of the elimination of modern civilization. While the public only learned of the automated Soviet "Doomsday Weapon System", designed to respond in the event that no senior controller was able to prevent a response to a nuclear detonation in the USSR in the late 1990s, it is likely that the US military not only knew of it, but probably has a similar but larger system. This would tend to ensure that even today, Bernard Bereanu's prediction remains accurate. We will most likely be eliminated accidently by our own "defense" systems, at least if we don't deliberately eliminate ourselves before then. |
The United States consider powerful navies and large standing armies as permanent establishments to be detrimental to national prosperity and dangerous to civil liberty. The expense of keeping them up is burdensome to the people; they are in some degree a menace to peace among nations. A large force ever ready to be devoted to the purposes of war is a temptation to rush into it. The policy of the United States has ever been, and never more than now, adverse to such establishments, and they can never be brought to acquiesce in any change in International Law which may render it necessary for them to maintain a powerful navy or large standing army in time of peace - Secretary of State William Marcy The Free Press, 1856-08-26, Vol 3-6, p12 | ||
|
They're rioting in Africa. They're starving in Spain. But we can be tranquil and thankful and proud, Merry Minuet - The Kingston Trio (1959) |
|||
- Printer-friendly version
- Login or register to post comments
